When you look at the 34 control area sequences determined in this research we observed a complete of 14 haplotypes (GenBank #EU022531–EU022544). Seven among these haplotypes corresponded to those formerly reported by Cunha et al. (2005) and/or Caballero et al.
(2007) whereas one other seven were unique; no haplotypes corresponded to haplotypes of Sotalia fluviatilis (online Appendix S3). Haplotype 3 has also been present in our control that is positive of guianensis, and corresponded to Sotalia guianensis Hap11 (GenBank #AY842456) of Cunha et al. (2005), and HapB (GenBank #EF027064) and HapC (GenBank #EF027065) of Caballero et al. (2007). Into the cytochrome b sequences we observed five Sotalia haplotypes (GenBank #EU022545–EU022549) that corresponded to Sotalia guianensis (online Appendix S4). Probably the most typical haplotype is just like the entire cytochrome b haplotype of Sotalia guianensis reported by Cunha et al. (2005) whereas three other haplotypes corresponded to haplotypes reported by Caballero et al. (2007); one haplotype ended up being novel.
It really is clear that the “boto” amulets sold in areas of primary Amazonian metropolitan areas are maybe not produced by the real boto (Inia geoffrensis ). All amulets, should they are of dolphin origin at all, are unambiguously based on the marine types Sotalia guianensis. This means that the “boto” fetishes most most likely originate in the seaside regions of North Brazil, and therefore are then exported to your main Amazon cities on the market.UTF8[……]